That’s a curious hypocrisy you’ve highlighted.
Women are torn between viewing people as babies and nurturing them, but also desiring men who seem more grown up and mature in the public eye. Racism being associated with Lower Class or more Infantile behavior makes them despise it in the men they see, but this might also explain why they take up positions lecturing and playing as activists to these Men or others they see who need to be “Educated” in order to mature.
Banning alcohol was done because it was seen as immature to engage in by these women. And with the political shift, men with ideas like Fuentes become more appealing when Leftism fails to address our economy and ability to thrive, i.e. provide for families, which is seen as a masculine quality that the Feminine is designed to encourage.
What is curious then is how Women view the 19th amendment and Women’s rights under the light of this logic. They would have to believe that it would lead to either a more mature society (Where people are educated about the “Crucial” role and need for women’s suffrage), or they would have to believe that it would lead to their ability to provide for their families better. The latter of which is only their facade, the former is the Drive of theirs that has been hijacked I think.
In nature, they are meant to preserve the Morals of their household and educate children, and so Feminism is seen as a means of educating and preparing the youth.
In order for women to be racist, they need to see the direct result of how Tolerance actually harms their safety and the safety of their children. This drive is manipulated by showing them how “Racism” has affected non-white children in the past, thus fueling their desire to educate newer generations of White children to not be racist so as to protect the other children. Meaning that the only way to reverse this trend is to show them how White children have been harmed by things like Mass Immigration and racial egalitarianism.
Many White Women in Europe are becoming especially Right Wing after seeing the effects of the Grooming Gangs, and all the Rapes of European Women that police have been ignoring for over a decade. When they fixate on this and ignore the foreign children, they revert back to their natural form.
*Added note, all the stalkers and harassers in the UK are speedrunning this change. These women are going out, getting harassed by some Paki in the middle of the night, and the sheer frequency of this occurring has started to shift their perspective.
I always thought it was the lack of their own family and so they just see poor brown people as the vunerables they need to protect. It’s why they immediately snap to conservatism when they get married with children. Can even be seen in there difference between conservatism in women who are simply married, and married with children. Might just be correlation, though.
I think that fits in with the narrative perfectly.
Women who have children get to see first hand how racial egalitarianism affects their people, and thus they see other children as not of their own. A broody hen will sometimes kill Chicks she did not hatch herself, viewing them as competition for her own chicks.
The brainwashing cannot withstand such a reality. Though something should be said about the women who are married with children and still practice Liberal Marxist values, often gender bending their own children in various ways, or overlooking preference for their own children in favor of a more universalist mentality.
Such women are often bad mothers, because they fail to properly prioritize their own children over others, and are the cause of divorce among other problems. Though I do think that the statistical generality is true, Women with Children tend to lean more Right Wing.
The government is actively resettling people here through all sorts of programs. I guess it depends on the context.
Also what exactly is the alternative to laissez-faire given this economic crisis? I’m not stanning libertarianism, I don’t think it leads to a healthy society. I just think given these conditions, they’re right. If you want housing to be affordable, deregulate the housing market.
You also can’t “move on” from economic strategies. They come and go, but they’re always there waiting to be used.
I don’t think libertarianism has ever been less relevant than it is today.
This is my fault for wording choice.
I meant to say what you are saying.
Basically, what I meant to say, is that the libertarian elites are, themselves, becoming more frustrated with the left.
In the past, they might have sided with the liberal-left, wanting to fight against Christian conservatism and nationalism.
I believe that they have now become frustrated with some things, such as the Left’s handling of homelessness, Pro-Palestine activism, Occupy Wall Street, and even the negativity of the anti-white cultural movements.
So, I think that the libertarians will take more actions and they will grow in numbers a bit.
I think maybe you’re right, at least in Europe. In America, yeah some come for government sponsored programs, but most just come to live in a white society and economy. In America, we’re definitely not shipping them in. All you have to do is not arrest anyone that comes over and you’re done for, which is what libertarianism calls for.
I like the concept of laissez-faire, it just doesn’t work in low trust society, at all. It requires literally everyone to opt in. It’s one of the few economic systems that isn’t will to power. Communism, command economy, whatever, can all go “you won’t scam people at your shitty mini-mart, else we will literally shoot you.” Libertarianism requires an extreme amount of participation I don’t view as possible.
Sure, sometimes. Like for example, I like the idea of building a shitshack on some land. Regulations make it hard. Not as hard as the people with plenty of capital who, if not regulated, will buy up every plot they can get their hands on at $2000/acre and relist it immediately for $12000/acre. So, deregulation only solves some parts of it, just like regulation.
Yeah I get it. You can’t kill a thought. There was a 2000 year gap between when democracy was relevant. That doesn’t mean democracy was hip in 1230AD, though.