Hamas will win against Israel. It’s written in stone. They won by engaging in terrorism to bait Israel to massacre them. They knew all along that they would suffer massacres. When asked about it, they respond with the phrase: “we love death more than you love life.“ They will win in the end, since the world is turning on Israel for its evil.
They are able to use terrorism since their case (military conquest of land by a state) is favored by modern morality. The dissident right has little favor, especially by establishment thinkers. Terrorism will never be accepted. We must get a lot smarter.
But here’s what can be done. European people who are tired of being replaced can simply quit paying taxes. It is a statement to the government: if you want to replace us, we will not support your existence with our money. The government then has been baited to throw them in jail.
It all must be done simultaneously, all across Europe. It’s like coming-out-of-the-closet day, except this is going to be far more high-stakes, because it matters far more than bum-f***ing frivolity.
Once videos start being released of a million ethnic British being thrown in jail, the government will look evil. It’s just like the deportation videos in the USA right now, but flipped. There will be no more controversy that the government is coercing the people into being ethnically replaced.
Liberals thrive on their sense of moral goodness. They cannot persevere with their mendacious plans if put in a position where their sanctimonious self-image is forced to crack.
This is rather like the strategy of the Boston Tea Party. They quit paying taxes, and threw tea overboard. They baited the British to come and try to do something about their rebellion. When the redcoats came in, demanding quarter in people’s homes and quelling mobs with muskets, the patriots were able to paint them as vicious oppressors.
I’m becoming increasingly aware that intellectual activity is mostly a waste of effort. The only useful effort there is to get other right-wingers to stop saying false things (conspiracies, vaccine denial, etc.). As for the moral aspect of right-wingers, being dickheads, there is no amount of studying that can fix that. This is a problem of being from a bad family, and from failing to socially integrate from a young age, such that you never learned the rules of what not to say.
As for winning the cause - liberals must be brought to their knees. People who are hard-headed always must be brought to their knees to change. There is no way around this. There is no compromise, and no worth in having agonizing mock-debates that go nowhere. There is only one path: the use of “force,” and the question of how to use “force” in a way that succeeds.
In a way I’m disputing the purpose of this website, which is dumb of me!
I kind of agree in the sense that the leaders need to be correct and make correct decisions, and they need expertise for that. Especially when they hold power over the whole of society.
I’m not sure about regular folks. They ought to keep their mouths shut. Seriously - people need to know if they don’t know the world, and if they don’t know history.
This is a problem in Democracy - you have this situation where the Everyman loudly asserts opinions. What does Charlie Kirk really know? Nothing. That’s what he knows. According to Confucius, “He who is not in any particular office, has nothing to do with plans for the administration of its duties.“ (Analects Book 8 T’AI-PO Chapter 14) This is just common sense, and democracy stands in opposition to common sense.
And, in terms of intellectualizing defenses or arguments for the positions of nationalism, I’m not sure there’s a lot of depth or complexity to that issue. It’s kind of straightforward.
I’d suggest though, if we want to be like leaders, we should be educated and get things right 100% of the time.
The hurdle to real change is the belief that you aren’t smart enough to figure out all the answers.
The people who run the world are retarded, including its most advanced scientists.
People who know a lot about politics and history (like Nick Fuentes) have a narrow perspective. While eclecticism is low-status, it is entirely intellectual – possibly even more effective than the guy who reads the entire Marxist canon.
Before you can act, you need to know what to do. Otherwise you’re just a larper expressing yourself.
The most effective way to win is group perfectionistic study. Breaking it down, one problem at a time, and sharing your information in a clear and concise manner. This requires creativity.
Actually, the Confucians supported making everybody educated because they seemed to believe that the process of studying would make people into better people.
