Christianity and whites

Metapolitics & General
1

The relationship between the white world and Christianity has been longstanding, yet the notable decline of Christianity and Europeans globally prompts a critical inquiry: Should Europeans finally abandon Christianity altogether? Notably, the largest organizations facilitating refugee resettlement in Europe are Christian charities, particularly from Northern Europe, with Germany at the forefront. These organizations often oppose the notion of a unified white identity and advocate for the self-preservation of ethnic Europeans.

This raises the question: Should we turn to paganism or adopt an atheistic perspective that emphasizes “might is right”? I contend that if Europeans do not invest their seriousness, effort, and determination into these discussions, they will ultimately prove irrelevant.

In my view, a revised, consistent interpretation of biblical Christianity could revitalize ethnic Europeans. While it is often quoted that Jesus instructed followers to “not resist an evil-doer” and to “go the extra mile for your enemy,” it is crucial to contextualize these teachings within the historical framework of Jesus and Paul of Tarsus’ time. Their extraordinary actions—such as self-denial and familial rejection—were necessary for spreading the worship of one true God during their era. However, such “advice” is not applicable today and should not be treated as such.

Christianity’s expansion and its eventual establishment as the religion of Rome under Constantine marked a significant turning point: “In this sign, you shall conquer.” This represented an eschatological moment where nations acknowledged the one true God. Theoretically, Christians await further revelations from God, suggesting that violence, ethnic cleansing, and supremacism could be justified within a coherent interpretation of biblical worship.

If anyone wants to read more about coherent bible reading and constantinian eschatology, i’d recommend:
https://x.com/Katapetasma2

2

We can pursue other options. Might is right is not the only alternative to Christianity.

3

What do you think a realistic framework of religion would be for white people in the future?

4

Please see this thread.

I have been a Perennialist most of my life. Always hated atheism and materialism.

I have been thinking about this problem for years and I am here to tell you that the answer is materialism. Not the baby soft Redditor atheism you’re familiar with, but the most extreme and complete materialism which is possible, which goes beyond atheism. An engineer by the name of Bill Gaede has figured out how this universe works in purely physical terms, and he has answered every major philosophical problem, including consciousness.

I am currently working on a spiritual pamphlet which outlines how such a worldview could be aligned with spirituality (which I define as euphoria). It is a faith for the internet autist / activist, not the general public. The general public, being very atomized, requires religious pluralism or a civic religion.

material existence
material existence543×800 103 KB

A spiritual euphoria is dependent on one’s material conditions. Thus, the “dread” that materialism inspires in you is just a technical problem.

Made a video about this recently:

5

I think that, whatever the religion would be, it would probably look something like Bhuddism. Not in aesthetics, but in values.

Few major reasons:

  1. Jesus is basically a Bhudda. I mean, seriously. He was based on Mithra, who was also probably the inspiration for Maitreya.
  2. Sincere, good, civic-minded, humanistic white people are already dabbling with Bhuddism and finding value there.
  3. Bhuddism interacts well with materialistic worldviews

I think that there is one drawback. I believe that white people have a deontological style of moral philosophy, which I do not like. I feel like this style is rather un-Bhuddist. But I might be wrong, about some of that…maybe whites are not deontological, but seem that way from the outside, and I’m reading them wrongly.

6

The only thing I agree with Buddhism about is humility. Otherwise, their anti-consumptive / anti-fun attitude isn’t human. Much of Buddhism is posturing as “wise,” even though Buddhists do not experience very much of the human condition. They quite literally encourage you to stay in a zombie-like trance 24/7.

The proposed ideology should not be anti-intellectual; it should attempt to tell the truth about our reality. It should also be more like a set of universal principles as opposed to a formalized doctrine. It has to be authentic / organic, and it also has to organize the material conditions into a coherent picture. Materialism is perfect here, because the material conditions are absurd. You can annihilate any Christian’s attempt at dignity or composure by showing them “cocky want boing boing.” But materialism can handle such absurdities flexibly.

cocky want boing boing
cocky want boing boing618×800 425 KB

7

Another thing that I’d like to point out is that Christians have conned people into believing that organized religion is crucial for human flourishing – that “you will never be happy” without a personal god, or that civilization will fall apart – “humans were not designed to think rationally.” In fact, they hate anyone who would dare live differently.

fisherman's chapel
fisherman's chapel1002×800 217 KB

The Fisherman’s Chapel, Tristram Hillier (1938).

They’ve even gone so far as to make shrewd materialist arguments invoking group evolutionary psychology. Apparently, it is perfectly acceptable for a Christian to argue that his religion is “useful nonsense.”

But what is this other than desperation. Christian activists have been touched by something that they believe to be God. They’ve had a powerful experience maybe, they’ve felt a presence. And they believe in this so strongly that they will say anything to legitimize their point of view, even if that means getting Darwinian.

And they go out into the world trying to protect their faith, and they see the masses, they see that they’re going through something and that they have problems. And, in frustration, this small group asks them to put two and two together, that the reason why they are unhappy and deracinated is because of their secular apathy. People aren’t interested in Christianity anymore, so God (or nature I guess) is punishing them.

Actually, these are just very human problems that occur naturally and without any influence. People become depressed because their country sucks or their life sucks or there’s no community. But then things get better and people move on.

Christianity has held Europe hostage for thousands of years. When the Church lost power, people began to express their true feelings and stopped attending these annoying services. Nobody liked studying the Bible and hearing these endless parables. Nobody liked fasting or paying tithes. Nobody cared about charity. People wanted to spend their day off with friends or down at the pub, or by the river eating cakes. (See Zipf’s Principle of Least Effort).

dali
dali600×450 69.7 KB

The Temptation of St. Anthony, Salvador Dalí (1946)

Christians feel that there’s something wrong with the normies, and that they can fix them. They shouldn’t be down at the river eating cakes, they should be down at the service worrying about Jesus. Actually, it’s the activists who are disordered. The normies get along just fine in their own stupid bubble. They have relationships, they have hobbies, they have dreams, some even have kids. And to them, the question “Where did the universe get started” is just a meaningless philosophical idea, it’s something for smart people to think about. But the activists quite literally fall apart and become non-functional when their belief system can’t gel with the facts. They are like people who abuse alcohol, it provides external scaffolding.

8

The form of Bhuddism whites would want is the kind that people do in Thailand. (That’s why whites like Thailand so much)

The different forms can be wildly different.

But basically the religion would have to be super-modern and not really dogmatic or too spiritual. A kind of secular religion. And it would not be some culty thing with community. It would be a supervening cultural moral system. The purpose would be entirely moral; it would be a system that helped people to do moral reasoning. Sort of like Confucianism, except with different values.

9

Using the name/image/symbol of Jesus Christ always elicits a negative emotion from an evil person.

I use his symbol to get evil people to reveal themselves to me so I know to avoid them. These same people who are genuinely evil (not a confused person) will not swear on the bible because they use wording to remove responsibility from their actions.

We used his name and his word to make sure that whoever evil person was in a position of power would be bound by the “spellings” written in that book.

A society bound by those in service to the people whom had to pledge their soul to that which is the most disgusting to evil, allowed to us to flourish more so than the Oriental race because the high trust society we built was built on this, because it was much more intuitive because it was based on love and statutes to love rather than saving face.

I think there is a strata of west Europeans have been genetically filtered to be hardwired to go against their evolutionary instincts of impulsiveness and act in the manner of good God fearing folk that even if they try hard to act degenerate they do not have it in them.

I think those kinds don’t technically need to evoke the name of Jesus Christ but they are easily deceived without it. Especially Scandinavian people.

We don’t need to have God, but to succeed we have to have their minds warped into the east Asian saving face form of trust. Intuitive high trust society is for these types who are hardwired to do things properly, however these types easily could be overwhelmed my people who aren’t us… again