Has anyone else heard a claim circulate around, and you want to believe it, but then when you research it, you realize it is a parroted lie that got repeated until being accepted as gospel, or just doesn't have evidence?

Metapolitics & General
1

Here are some examples of things I heard a bunch of people claim, and I wanted badly to believe it:

  1. Stalins birth name means “son of a jew”
  2. The qur’an calls Allah the best deciever.
  3. Trotsky invented the word “rayciss”
  4. Goyim is the same word for cattle

But then when I researched these for evidence, I sadly could not find direct proof of it.

Stalins original name translates to “Son of Juga.” To us english folk, juga does sound like jew, but “jew” in the other language does not sound like jew at all.

It is debated what juga means so it technically could be some obscure byword for jew, but I cant find any evidence of that.

The word used to describe Allah in the qur’an CAN translate to deciever, which makes that claim the most likely out of all of these, but the issue is that the word used to describe Allah can also mean “planner”, “mover”, and sometimes “schemer”.

“Planner” is considered to be the most “faithful” translation by scholars.

The word “rayciss” existed prior to Trotsky, but, to be fair to the mindless parrots who say he invented it, Trotsky did actually use “rayciss” against his enemies a lot. Which makes no sense because who are Russians going to be “Rayciss” against? The only non slavs I can think of in Russia are Chechens and Mongols, but the USSR was not a fan of those either I don’t think.

Trotsky was kind of silly. Acting as if his commie friends would like the islam minority in Russia any better than the former regime did.

As for the goycattle thing, I once again could find no evidence for it, and there is a word in hebrew for cattle and it sounds quite different from “goy”. That being said i do imagine that jewish people view goyim in a lowly manner, because their book says so. I just could not find evidence of “cattle” being the same word as “non-heeb”.

So yeah. Has anyone else heard widely repeated claims online, wanted to believe it, only to be very disappointed later?

2

I had a theory that homosexuality was made up and that gay people are just pretending to be women – kind of like trannies. I pointed out how gay animals are fake, for instance.

But the more I researched it, the more clear it became that Joseph Nicolosi was right and that it comes from trauma. I still think that gay animals are fake though.

3

The whole Goyim thing is somebody misconstruing the issue.
Goyim just refers to non-jews, but in the Talmud they refer to Goyim as cattle.
However its not hard to see why somebody would extrapolate from this and start using the term Goyim in an ironic sense to refer to the way that Jews view non-jews.

All of these issues are easily avoided by thinking for yourself and actually researching things Before coming to your conclusions.

4

pirates wore eyepatches to better see in the dark below decks

really they didnt wear eyepatches, except for when one eye happened to be gouged out

5

I was duped by a lot of “We was kangz” stuff.

I was told my whole life that Yams (sweet potatoes) were from Africa and they reached us via slaves.

In reality, they originate in South America, and they did also reach us through slaves.

I made this claim to a coworker once, and they proved me wrong, and it was really humiliating. This is why I really dislike it when myths are spread like this.

6

Chud lies I have been told about but have not confirmed myself:

  1. “Albert Einstein was a plagiarist.” Albert Einstein’s contributions were not a one-off fluke or theft, he was repeatedly pivotal over his entire career. There is no way he could have stolen all his exceptional ideas from other people as a patent clerk.

  2. “Prince Coudenhove-Kalergi was an enemy of the white race.” The mongrel prince never advocated for white genocide. In his book, he advocated against Asian encroachment on white Australia, and warned against the decline of nobility through miscegenation.

7

I did not know that.

8

Just look at what Scientific American has to say about one particular issue: