Blasphemy.
Be careful or you’ll end up with somebody like Elliot Rodger for your son.
Hey, at least he’s not like me, I keep finding black women hot
I know but they’re soooooo cute
Looks like a bug.
https://culturedvultures.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/03/limmy.jpg
Ooga Booga where tha White Boys at?
No way she’s a cutie
To quote Aarvol:
**“**Men with non-White wives: please stop applying to RTTL. You’re making me sad”
Racemixing is wrong, but I don’t think there’s anything wrong saying what you really feel about other races.
People pretend that they aren’t attractive but they clearly are.
I think that the races evolved characteristics to attract mates, and so when you go all the way to the end of the spectrum, you get a racial fetish.
For example, Asian people have golden skin; white people get tans.
It depends on how you define Attraction.
The distinction is in fetishization vs genuine attraction, as all race mixing is inherently an extension of fetishization and not of a genuine attraction that could only be born out of a recognition on the deepest level and spiritual unity. Shared values, shared biological traits/adaptations, shared culture, shared heritage, all of which are an extension of Self Love, without which no genuine connection between individuals can occur, and that self ignorance/self hatred will be perpetuated onto you bastard offspring who will have absolutely no healthy sense of self.
Most relationships now adays are certainly guided along artificial fetishistic lines, even if the people are of the same race, they still fetishize banal material traits and not the genuine variables.
Furthermore, tolerance for immoral ideas, even if in an ironic manner, is the type of irreverence that leads to decadence. Failing to treat these ideas as dangerous fosters tolerance for them, just as the prevalence of Gay irony in the 2000s aided in the normalization of homosexuality in the 2010s (Aided of course by the notion of psychological projection, which is often used to gaslight individuals into acting out negative behaviors. I.e. You are only engaging in a behavior because it is a genuine manifestation of your will, when in fact it is not.)
Furthermore, tolerance for immoral ideas, even if in an ironic manner, is the type of irreverence that leads to decadence. Failing to treat these ideas as dangerous fosters tolerance for them, just as the prevalence of Gay irony in the 2000s aided in the normalization of homosexuality in the 2010s (Aided of course by the notion of psychological projection, which is often used to gaslight individuals into acting out negative behaviors. I.e. You are only engaging in a behavior because it is a genuine manifestation of your will, when in fact it is not.)
Idk I find this line of reasoning really annoying. It just lends itself to peasant fearfulness and mindless bookburning.
Being hostile to ideas and giving them the special ‘power’ of the taboo usually puts more passion behind subversive advocacy of them or general opposition to your suppression
I firmly believe that if homosexuality weren’t thrown around as a weapon to attack any abnormal behavior, then fags nowadays wouldn’t be so equipped to try and ‘recruit’ people in the same trigger-happy manner. “Oh? You know specific color names? FAGGOT! KILL YOURSELF!” became “Oh, you know specific color names? Yaaass quween, come out of the closet already!!1” with a disturbing smoothness.
tl;dr In general, I think any sort of muzzle on thought itself is gay and stupid, but also putting pressure down on ideas is going to lead to a pressure buildup and a rupture of everything you’re trying to contain
Most relationships now adays are certainly guided along artificial fetishistic lines, even if the people are of the same race, they still fetishize banal material traits and not the genuine variables.
DAE BIG TIDDY GOTH GURL!!!11???
I can agree with this partially, we have to do more to genuinely educate people on why things are moral and immoral, otherwise they revert to immoral behaviors out of rebellion, such as the rejection of Christian dogma leading the Hippie movement.
However, we should absolute limit and censor certain negative ideas to an extent.
Children should absolutely not be subjected to pornography.
Trans and homosexual issues should not be taught to children, at least not in the context they are currently presented.
I do believe that children are more intelligent then we give them credit for and we should nurture their ability for learning, but also understand that they are children, are more emotional, and should not subjected to dangerous ideas that could corrupt their otherwise healthy upbringing.
Censorship must be used as a weapon, otherwise the ideas of our enemies are allowed to spread and corrupt people. It’s the same reason we have laws. You’re right about pressure build up, but that doesn’t mean we just keep the flood gates open, we need to mitigate and try to manage its flow into a more acceptable manner that allows for filtration.
Exactly.
Or women valuing men for Money, or Steroid muscles, or shallow politcal beliefs, or various other involvements in subculture, music choice, movie preference, reading preference, all of which is informed largely by Corporate think tanks, monopolizing our psychology and anything we might use to construct our identity.
I see.
I feel that I should explain my political and spiritual views.
-
I’m a hardcore white nationalist. The only value that I am absolutely certain about is that I love white people and want to protect them.
-
If you want to save your race, then you have to start from reality. So I try to keep an open mind about any and all ideas – save for my love of white people.
So religion, economics, views on biology, morals – I treat all of those as though I might be wrong. Because the truth is really important to me.
-
White nationalism is a technical problem. It is like trying to escape from a maximum-security prison. So you have to use your intellect to “get out” ie end democracy.
-
So the more intelligent that you become, the better. So a white nationalist should aspire to become something of a “virtuoso” – just like a virtuoso guitarist.
I call this perspective “Virtuosity.” It’s about extreme group studying, radical openness, problem-solving.
-
This forum was designed to give Virtuosity a place to develop in a collective-sense. Not just me studying and problem-solving, but multiple people. I allow all points of view here.
-
My views on spirituality are explained here. I’m basically a really hardcore materialist, and am directly influenced by Bill Gaede’s work. He is so “materialist” that he has gone beyond atheism, and proposes that atoms are physically connected.
Of course, as I stated in the video, I am spiritual. I just define it differently.
I think ‘subculture/etc preference’ can mean something worthwhile in a given context, such as representing artistic preferences, ideas one enjoys or approves of, sensations one likes, all of which could relate to character and such. But it has to be infused with actual self-expression regarding this preference, that’s what provides the information. I think honestly if everyone wrote fiction or made art to some extent, that would be better for picking out a date than just what one consumes. It’s the same reason steroid muscles are less compelling than actual ones, because natty muscles are built where steroid muscles are a result of consuming. Meanwhile money can be considered to be desired for the desire of consuming.
What a person builds is an expression of them, their personhood, thus their ‘soul’, whereas what a person consumes receives its significance from how much it can reflect them. Obviously if you’re picking a person based on the person, as love ideally is, what matters is the (non-material) substance of them, not their accoutrements.
we have to do more to genuinely educate people on why things are moral and immoral
Unfortunately, the squeamish thought-muzzling I complained about earlier is, in my eyes, exactly why we didn’t. The gay butt secks was too icky to explain why it’s wrong, and so people assumed that people would know that it’s wrong because it’s icky, and then we transitioned into a society where icky and wrong are the same thing and thus, conversely, what feels good and right must be good and right.
However, we should absolute limit and censor certain negative ideas to an extent.
Children should absolutely not be subjected to pornography.
Trans and homosexual issues should not be taught to children, at least not in the context they are currently presented.
Well, this isn’t about the concepts themselves, is it? It’s about the context. You don’t have to say you’re against nuclear power just because you don’t want to wear a chastity cage made out of thorium at all times.
Artistic preference without any coherency, or correlation to natural/material reality.
I.e. the works of Marvel Movies (Jewish hollywood slop), which reinforce corporate propaganda. The likes of the existentialists, who are ultimately nihilists, etc. Art that doesn’t reflect reality being a disease, because it is an idea that it in itself unnatural.
Yes, if somebodies natural inclinations align with an aesthetic preference, this could be considered healthy, but in the vast majority of cases, people do not pursue these things from an intrinsic sense of self, but from a desire to consume, fostered within them since childhood to get them to fixate on a bunch of shit that doesn’t matter, and will only cost them time and money and dopamine.
Not everyone should create art either, for the same reason that Democracy is a failure. Not everyone has what it takes to manifest healthy higher forms of expression, and their inclusion in that sphere of influence actively degrades those participants who are of a higher quality, and who do deserve to create art.
Either you limit the participation of the lower men in society, or you remove them entirely via eugenics or segregation. I for one could use a break from all the countless mumble rap albums that have completely captured the zeitgeist, as these people do not deserve to be treated as artists, let alone human beings for that matter.
Weaker souls should not be allowed to participate in higher matters. As their reflection is not something that should be proliferated. However, in terms of mate selection, it is not a matter of non-material variables, but rather more important material variables (This being my rhetoric, in viewing all things as material constructs, as they are fundamentally of this world.)
There is no context whatsoever where pornography or rape or pedophilia or homosexuality is moral, it is a sickness in every case. These concepts in themselves are reflections of physical realities that invariably lead to negative outcome: Trauma, hedonism, perversion, social degradation, etc.
Every idea is a manifestation of physical/biological reality.
Every culture is a manifestation of a Groups particular biological affinity.
Every idea, good or bad, reflects a behavior that results in either positive or negative outcomes for the organism that practices them (With varying degrees of success).
If the reality of a group of people is that they cannot do the right thing, then force is necessary at a certain point to make them do the right thing.
I think that civilization will eventually realize the importance of eugenics for things like order, geopolitics, and economic growth.
I also think that civilization will eventually exterminate leftism.
Nature will always return to balance.
People need to realize the truth of racial biology.