Marbles, Piss, and Ketamine.

img-0004.avif


A woman strangled her three young children to death with an exercise band.

She claims that a voice spoke to her, and vies for an insanity plea. Legal debate ensues, what really defines “insane” in her case? There exists nuance, and where nuance exists, legalists pounce. Lawyer aspie heaven. It’s their job, after all, to examine the minutiae of such a case. Naturally, local news wants it. A mother mass-murderer? Story of a lifetime. It presses on past the natural, into the public conscience. Suddenly, it falls apart. Why?

It never should have been presented at scale. It’s a tragic story that affects the community, local families, close relatives. It has nothing to do with the nation, especially not the world.

It kicks down the door of the public conscience. Suddenly, everyone has an opinion. The bottom quintile has a firm grasp. Mutation as it lies in the mud.

“This woman, Lindsay Clancy, couldn’t possibly be responsible. Not only was she insane, but she was insane because of the cocktail of drugs the system put her on”.

Again, like some disgusting digital bloodborne pathogen, it spreads from lip to lip. Another mutation.

“This woman, Lindsay Clancy, couldn’t possibly be responsible. Not only was she insane because of the cocktail of drugs she was on, but her husband bears responsibility. ‘Through sickness and health’! How could he have not stopped it, or at least known”?

The gossip spreads, there exists no city wall to contain it.

“This woman, Lindsay Clancy, couldn’t possibly be responsible. Not only did her husband keep her retarded with a cocktail of drugs, he also slaughtered his own children”!


This incessant need to explain it all away, where does it come from? She lies bare before the court, and a tribe of women spread across the globe, seek to grind the process to a halt. It’s not a passive interest, but one that takes hold of their entire being, a sort of obsession. They feel every lash that might strike this woman’s back.


It’s a party. Or at least, if you consider doing drugs and being sexually depraved a party, it is. A young woman makes the decision to explore what she might be interested in, sexually. Half drunk, she turns up to the fratter, determined to sleep with a man she’s interested in. He pitches a different kind of expedition, perhaps a friend of his could join. She agrees. The young men are incredibly intoxicated on both alcohol and horse-tranq, they invite her to partake. She decides to snort horse tranquilizer off of one of the young man’s erect penis. The “party” continues, another two men. She agrees.

This woman exists as the product of a sexually liberated world. Why should she deny herself that which the body craves, at least in that moment? Young men sit around, bored with the whore, intoxicated themselves. Some passing out, barely keeping their hedonistic desires higher than the desire to sleep. Horse Tranquilizer has that tendency, even when you snort it off a whore’s body. They let their brothers know, lest they be selfish. “Free pussy”, they tell the group text.

That is, they’ve found a woman who doesn’t even take a night out at Chili’s to fuck.


It’s degeneracy, the kind that’s embarrassing. Like drinking a guy’s piss, a woman might do it, but if her friends found out, there’d be hell to pay socially. Turns out, when you get railed by multiple men in a night, some might kiss and tell. It gets around. Embarrassed by your own intoxicated hedonism, you distance yourself from it.

“Yeah I did it, but it wasn’t all that bad. Sexual depravity isn’t illegal, right? Only a matter of time before people are more open to this kind of thing”.

Confusion, henpicking. A disgusted roommate prods her, ‘you really did that’?

“Yeah I did it, but I mean, I was just going along with it, I probably wouldn’t do it again”.

Ostracism, shame. ‘I mean, that kinda sounds rape-y, right?’

“Yeah, honestly, I don’t even remember it. In fact, they kind of were shoving drugs and dicks in my face all night. Plus, they dis-invited me from their halloween party thanks to the rumors…”

Rape kit, police report.


Criminal investigation falls through, weird intoxicated sex shit isn’t a crime in New York.

Civil suit.

Again, it breaches containment. Mass outrage. The date-rape stories that have been floating around for a half-century vindicated yet again, at least to the feminine public eye. They don’t have a tendency to notice whenever they’re eventually discredited or rescinded, the initial outrage remains the only important concept of note.

“String em up!”

They cry, their ingroup under attack as always, their natural defense response firing on all cylinders.

I know her. The internet told me about her. She exists as a concept in my conscience. She’s a member of my tribe.


It’s mind numbing, brain destroying. Like putting a polar bear in a pit and watching it walk in circles for months on end. The natural reaction to stimuli completely fried by an unnatural input. Women genuinely can’t handle it. They are built to protect their tribe, socially ostracizing outsiders. Their tribe has been inadvertently expanded. It’s too much, all at once. How, possibly, could the sensitive care for the world? The troubles, the pain, the horror of what was once a local tragedy flashes six inches away into her retinas. A complete nuke of the psyche.


Legitimately, within the next few years, this will be a hot-button political issue. Not these cases, but the reaction. The endless crashing of female hysteria to the point that not even the strongest of evidence will produce a seawall strong enough to stop it. It’s gotten to the point people are questioning the extended feminine conscience and female decision making for the first time in decades.

Hmm I think you put too much credence on rape accusations being some sort of reputational purity control.

First of all it’s not even some kind of virginity-restoration card to claim you’ve been raped. You usually claim it because of one of three things. 1) It actually happened. 2) Coercion didn’t happen but sex did so you’re using this accusation as vengeance to get back at them from abandoning you. 3) Nothing happened at all but you have something to gain from claiming it. Usually more fame or career related.

Regardless of the reason, all three versions paint you as the victim. Which is not actually a label you want if you wish to be socially desirable. It’s a label you want if it’s either the truth (or believe it to be) and you want justice or you wish to be pitied enough to be compensated.

With the Clancy situation… I believe all criminality stems from insanity so it’s moot to claim otherwise.

I have a handful of women relatives that actually share my opinion that she’s in the wrong. However I do have one that says her husband did it somehow? Which is by far the most bizarre take to me. Though I assume the people who blame the husband do so because they can’t believe or paint women as agentless therefore an external offender (men) has to be blamed. And because psychosis basically implies an agentless actor is at fault the psychosis excuse gets thrown out. Though this also ignores the possibility that Clancy is just lying about psychosis as a cover story.

I heard some people blame the system which I can sort of agree with. The doctors did everything right and legal but if we know post-partum psychosis is so dangerous and medication side effects can come with uncertainties then it seems optimal that anyone experiencing post-partum psychosis gets hospitalized immediately.

Idk what’s up with the latest trend of using the shittiest poster child for a reasonable talking point though.

I do however believe psychosis is real and causes problems to some extent but it doesn’t entirely strip ones agency away anyway. Like psychosis shifts your framework away from a common sense framework but you can still logic your way out of it. Like for example you could have a delusion where you think you’re literally a robot and the people around you are suspicious of you being one. Well you won’t be able to convince yourself you’re really human and or nobody hates you for being an imposter under psychosis but you can do a 3rd solution. You could earn the favorability of everyone around you instead. Just crack a joke about how you’re more human than Mark Zuckerberg or whatever. Boom. Done. Crisis averted.

Not all of them. The one I’m referring to is just the one in the news rn, the “Cornell 7” case, I just summarized it. Sometimes accusations seem pretty blatantly true, sometimes it’s he-said she-said. Other times it’s this. This example, being the most obvious one, basically removing consent ex post facto.

The point isn’t really about rape or murder. Honestly Clancy might have been insane, maybe the chick from Cornell really was raped. The reality of the situation, although they can be tragic, isn’t the main point.

The two main points are this;

These situations have escaped the natural boundary of judgement, and outside influence has messed with the communal decision. Both are examples where a decision has already been made. Clancy’s lawyer had his case to make about her insanity, the Cornell Jane Doe’s criminal investigation had been dismissed, and Cornell had already handed out disciplinary action. Immediately upon breaching the city wall and the outside world gaining knowledge about this stuff, it shook both of them up. Clancy’s lawyer has switched tactics, the jury was tainted, and the holdout juror became the focus. Jane Doe has opened up a civil suit, the men are being doxxed and chased out of careers and education, and the DA is reopening the investigation. Things only got shook up again when people became exposed to local news through a screen.

The second main point is that it just isn’t healthy. This sort of stuff just sets off a nervous system reaction within women. Through the growing communal network of the internet, their ingroup has grown unnaturally and exponentially. This means any sort of danger, even social or legal, to any woman they happen to have heard of one time invokes the same visceral reaction that in the past would happen when seeing a caveman shank one of their tribesmen. It hampers their decision making and sets them off. The alarm goes off in their head that they have to alert the tribe, but instead of giving a painful shriek into the distance, now they just post an instagram story. Any woman who disagrees will be ostracized, and so even if some women quietly don’t put weight on whatever the current outrage is, they usually won’t speak up.

Oh. Most of what you said could be chalked up as social disharmony.

I believe social harmony is extremely important and free speech inhibits harmony. Ironically free speech is being inhibited in most western countries but are only targeting men. At least when eastern countries inhibit free speech they understand misandry is just as dangerous as misogyny. This won’t necessarily cure mass hysteria from happening but it will mitigate significantly more.