In this thread I would like to respond to the popular notion that Michael Jackson was innocent, and that he was framed by the Jews.
Here’s an example of this narrative:
I will use some sources I found to argue that Jackson was probably guilty, and that this case is, at the very least, a complicated one.
I think that this is a great example of how white nationalists do not understand the problem of antisocials. It is true that Jews are a subversive category, but just because many of the people involved in this case were Jews does not mean that Jackson was innocent. Nobody is taking into account the fact that Michael displays antisocial characteristics, and is likely a pathological narcissist.
Cluster Bs should themselves be viewed as a subversive category, on par with homosexuals and federal agents.
How bizarre. I feel like I don’t want to believe it. His aura is very babyish and docile to me. Though even in the case of weak juvenile pedos there is usually angry mobs to reinforce the weight of their actions. MJ has enough defenders to weaken the accusations. Even descriptive words like babyish or juvenile associate with the word innocence. A juvenile character just feels innocent.
This reminds me when I was about 12 some adult cashier guy asked me if I lived nearby and was clearly attracted to me. I felt this guy had a very weak aura, honestly the first thought when I spoke to him was that he seemed easy to manipulate. (Yes I was an edgy kid though even in all my edginess I often felt I was incompetent. So how weak and incompetent do you have to be for a kid to see you that way?) I was overwhelmed by the attraction so I simply said that I didn’t live nearby.
Then when I was about 18 I started e-flirting with a different guy literally because I noticed he had a weak aura. Then he just confessed suddenly that he was a pedo?? Like didn’t even attempt to hide it. I didn’t say anything, I honestly just felt dizzy and deleted my account. This doesn’t mean every weak person you meet is a pedo and I’ve met nasty narcissistic pedos too but its an unique subtype. Usually everyone imagines a sex tourist cluster b pedo and that’s probably true most of the time but this other type feels different. I assume what it is some sort of hierarchy-blindness. To understand power dynamics you need to understand the hierarchy. You need to be aware of who has the advantage and how much of it. There’s a reason an adult beating a kid at checkers is pathetic. If you’re actually blind about this, you legitimately do believe anyone is fair game. It’s not enough to fear getting caught, you have to authentically feel something is gross or unfair.
Wyatt Stagg has an excellent Video Essay on Michael Jackson, essentially discussing what you’re talking about here:
His role as a kind of shape shifter, feeding on the youth of children (Mostly White Children), blending together racial realities, and essentially being the perfect manifestation of Judeo-Masonic America, hypnotizing the people through art and a faux status of godhood to condition people to support the immorality of him and his masters/peers.
As far as the Afro-American Anti-Semitism goes, I view it simply as an example of the extent to which African Americans have retained their racial solidarity in the face of the modern world, whereas White People have been more heavily conditioned to ignore their own. This can be seen in the OJ Simpson case, Tiger Woods, and any case where a Black criminal who is overwhelmingly guilty is still garnering public support from his Racial brothers.
Meanwhile, White People being conditioned to High Trust societies, notions of personal accountability, and empathy without restriction, will be quick to sell out even the most common criminals among their kin, and even actively cheer when demonstrably guilty Black Criminals walk free, viewing this inversion of reality as a kind of “Racial Justice” for the sins of their White forebears.
(Wyatt Stagg may also reference this idea in this video, but if not, I recommend anyone check out his channel. His narration may seem a bit drab at first, but he has a great minding for noticing the symbolism and narrative designs of Anti-White programming in Media, and once you see how rampant it is, you will start to see it everywhere, if you haven’t already.)
It is that charm that is intentionally designed to manipulate White Empathy. By adopting a persona which transcends the normal parameters of physical reality. He is neither Black nor White, Man nor Woman, Child nor Man. He is whatever he needs to be in a given moment to perfectly hypnotize his naive audience, and exploit mostly White Children.
