People who believe all intellect is found in agreeing with ‘the teacher’ and all excellence is found in seeking ‘the teacher’'s approval. By definition, followers. Deficient souls. Born slaves.
Redditors are now completely eviscerating Susan Dell for being ugly. It’s shocking how they will break their “Be Kind” values at the drop of a hat if they sense somebody who is meant to be their enemy.
It reminds me of an Asian female philosophy YouTuber called HanaClio who mentioned a male friend who liked sensitive literature, art, and so on, and yet this guy ridiculed Muslims, which she believes is cruel (her own words). She genuinely had a hard time understanding how a seemingly morally-chaste person who consumes so much art about the awfulness of cruelty, bias, hatred, etc. could still do such things.
She does not understand liberalism.
Nobody understands liberalism except for freaks like us.
Those people literally make me feel the lyrics of One-Winged Angel, I don’t care how cringe that sounds I mean it unironically
Let me redpill you about beliefs.
When a position is negotiable, it can be discarded. When it is non-negotiable, we bend reality to make it true.
So the fact that leftists act this way indicates that kindness is a negotiable value.
Every system perfects towards a locus. For me, that could be ORDER. For you Zenny, it could be MATURITY.
We refine our routines in service of this locus at the expense of everything else. So leftists perfect towards some undisclosed value at the expense of things like justice, socialism, and whatever else.
To answer her confusion: He probably dislikes Muslims for being annoying hard asses.
That is pretty much the lowest common denominator among those who dislike dune coons.
Foids, faggots, pajeets, kikes, Whites who are aware of what is happening, Christians who know what is happening…
The occasional progressive who observes the fact that muslim beliefs do not align with progressive beliefs…
They all dislike muslims for being overbearing, invasive, and intolerant. (Or a variation of those words)
Even the USSR hated muslims too, and invaded them, even if the muslims were socialists. That was not because of islam though, that was because the USSR was mindlessly expansionist, to the point where they might as well have been “Red America”.
The socialist president of Afghanistan was killed by the USSR. The perfect example of a cultist being killed by the cult he wanted to impress.
Redditors gave flack to Aristotle’s view on slavery, saying that pro-slavery arguments will be bad no matter how smart the defender is.
But I thought that Aristole was making sense.
One might even say red it’s true, etic function is the perfection and finishing of slaves.
I have noted that much of the paraphenelia of modern mass culture serves as a clear marker of an aptitude for bondage. When I see some one in a star wars shirt, for example.
The idea of cognitive dissonance has been over-popularized and over-emphasized by one of the most successful frauds in recent scientific history. This was a persuasive false account of cognitive dissonance in failed doomsday cults. The testimony was that the cultists become more dedicated and even started evangelizing only after doomsday passed uneventfully. In reality, that doesn’t happen, failed cults typically die pretty fast. People start leaving even before the final deadline. (If you’ve read the popular book Influence by Cialdini you’ve read the exact falsified account.)
On one hand factual disagreements in politics make it clear that some people (on at least one side of every issue) must be capable of self delusion. But, self delusion doesn’t promise a great survival advantage so it can’t be that strong.
I don’t know the exact truth, but anything that could be influenced by the popular misleading version of this idea needs to be scrutinized carefully. It’s no good falling into the same trap that has caught decades of psychologists. Some of the most useful information is knowledge of the most accepted false information.