The normie world is a rather evil place and the true aristocrat also "hates" normies while maintaining benevolence

https://www.reddit.com/r/whatdoIdo/s/R3O35U5PF7

Sometimes Reddit gives us a window into the reality-show-like drama of normie life, where domestic abuse, theft, and more, are commonplace.

This is, to be honest, the reality of life as a caucasian or african normie. IDK about others.

The reason that the aristocrat leads society and spearheads cultural change, especially through art, religion, and education, is that he hates normies.

But the aristocrat does not enjoy hating normies. He wants to have a world where he can love his society. He wants to walk out his front door and be excited to interact with whomever he encounters. He wants to be energized by daily life.

He cannot feel this way unless the normies fix their dysfunction. He takes it upon himself to lead the evolution of men. So that, one day, perhaps, existence will feel like a blessing, rather than a curse.

where do I find this aristocrat

They used to be everywhere. There probably still are some in UK, France, and some N. European countries. They are likely just about everywhere in Confucian Asia.

Just a small correction, having said that.

I’m using “True Aristocrat” to describe an ideal. As with all ideals, it exists in the mind, not in the real world, but the real world has people who are more aligned than others with the ideal.

This is brilliant.

They are everywhere, and still are. They’ve just been disenfranchised.

There are few aristocrats, some bourgeois, and many plebs.

Democracy caters to the bourgeois. They crowd formerly exclusive spaces, and compete with the aristocrats for power. The aristocrats are either outnumbered, or they get frustrated and leave.

Aristocrats are basically highly sensitive people. They feel deeply about injustice, and are called to act. An example might be Rupert Lowe, or Pat Buchanan.

Bourgeois are people like Musk, Trump, or Hillary Clinton.

Aristocrats have a large number of highly specialized traits. The main one is sensitivity, but then there’s stuff like IQ, moral sense, bravery, idealism, social cunning, cleanliness.

I don’t think I’m aristocratic: I’m a pervert and very childish.

Basically, all of the aristocrats are on Twitter. They tend to be a subset of the far right, which is a concentration of aristocratic tendencies.

Highly doubt it, they hardly had any left by the cultural revolution

Are you sure about that?

Granting that about China, we still have Korea and Japan

Learning about Christopher Lee has made me learn what an Aristocrat he truly was. Tolkien as well, time a million. CS Lewis was squarely a pleb.

Cousin to Ian Flemming, Inspiration for James Bond, WWII British Spy, Postwar Nazi Hunter, Mother was an Italian Countess, direct descendant of Emperor Charlemagne of the Holy Roman Empire, Francisco Scaramanga (James Bond Villain ‘The Man With the Golden Gun’), The Frankenstein Monster, Count Dookoo, Henry Baskerville, Microft Holms, Sherlock Homes, Saruman, Heavy Metal artist, Knighted by the Queen of England, related to General Robert E. Lee, Holds Guinness Book of World Records for most sword fights in movies (17), Rasputin in ‘Rasputin the Mad Monk’, Friends with the Beatles, part of the ensemble photograph of celebrities on the album cover of ‘Band on the Run’ Paul McCartney and Wings, oh what else? DRACULA 8 TIMES. It’s easier to list what he didn’t do. What a life.

Christopher Lee also won a scholarship in Ancient Greek and Latin; was fluent in French, Italian Spanish, and German; and was moderately proficient in modern Greek, Russian, and Swedish. He was “conversationally fluent” in Mandarin. And he was fluent in Tolkien’s elvish languages long before he portrayed Saruman in the films. Lee read the books when they originally were printed in the ‘50s, and became a devoted fan who studied the appendices so he would pronounce the elvish words correctly. He also met J.R.R. Tolkien briefly in a pub in Oxford, quite by chance.

Maybe Japan…