One of my opinions that causes me to diverge from the alt-right is that I believe that marriage patterns reveal that losers really do lose at life, and that, very soon, the rates of children born to never-married/loser women is going to drop off a cliff. The chances are a bit lower for black women, but I’m still betting on them, too.
Nothing about the modern world and its romantic/sexual dynamics could be seen as healthy or functional, which is why the Far Right often wishes to return to a mode of society in which the social and family contract is respected via tradition and stability.
Reproductive patterns are a two part reflection of both Environmental Demand and Biological Preference. A good way to conceptualize this is R/K Reproduction Patterns, where Type K produces few offspring but of a higher quality, and Type R produces Quantity in their offspring, but often lower individual competence.
European, Eskimo, and some Asian and North American Tribal peoples are more genetically inclined for this behavior of Type K, where harsher Northern Environments favor long term strategy via Neotony and other adaptations. While Southern Type R, African, Indian, Arab, and South American have been Polygamous throughout their history.
It has long been my assessment that the Type K also show greater signs of Pair Bonding ability/chemicals, which is the biological basis for monogamy.
However, social engineering and Industrial Globalization creates conditions that disrupt the organisms natural preferences. This is my long round about way of saying that the Losers that we see in society are often people more inclined to behaviors that are Healthier for them Genetically, but our ill favored due to modern Social Conditions favoring hypergamy and pure material provision.
This is not to say there aren’t Pure Losers in this sense, but that in a functional society this occurs far less frequently. Compare for example how many men were single in the 1800s or 1900s to how many are single now, it’s astronomically higher now than ever before.
The notion that “Most men don’t reproduce” is an inherently foreign concept to the Northern European, where in fact the majority of men Do reproduce, and aid in preserving a larger gene pool than hypergamous societies that have less genetic diversity.
Furthermore, the Christian and “Modern Archeology” stating that Europeans were promiscuous prior to Christianity largely base this assessment on observing a few decadent Nobles or Chieftans in old Europe, and assuming that everyone else must have lived like them. When in fact looking at the evidence we see that Most European Men were Monogamous throughout our entire history.
Where does this leave us today? The answer, play the game to the extent that it is Moral to do so. Become a provider, take care of your body, and for security sake find ways to exercise your own social engineering on your women. Women are unhealthy today, and that issue won’t be rectified by indulging their delusions. Don’t give them access to your money or assets, and ensure they are holding up their end of the bargain in a way where if they back out of the Social Contract they get penalized by not having you to provide for them.