Response to:
And:
I’m really fucking exhausted and overstimulated, but I am just distracted enough that I will respond to Tooky’s thoughts.
So, let’s just get this out of the way: Christianity and (sincere) Paganism are irrational and do not make any sense. Bill Gaede succinctly destroys these religions. The premise of there “being a” “God” (whatever the Hell that is supposed to mean) is a non-starter because we have no idea what the fuck you’re talking about. Nobody has defined the word exist in the last 10,000 years; all you will find are synonyms. This cuts the other way: atheism is equally guilty by proposing that “God” “doesn’t” “exist.” So atheism is just as irrational as theism. (And of course, that would put agnosticism in the same boat).
So if you’re going about it purely rationally, “believing” or “not believing” in a nonsense premise is, well, nonsense.
The question then becomes: do we believe in nonsense? Is this what being a nationalist is all about? Or is nationalism about saving Europeans from extinction? Because if you’re trying to achieve something in the real world, then why don’t you start with reality? Isn’t that the chessboard that we’re operating on? Why not think about things in a rational way?
So I agree with Tooky that this utilitarian shopping cart niggerism is quite offensive to my autism. But it is offensive not because it “won’t work” (which is a contradiction of your premise), but because it is politics wrapped up in smoke.
Look, what is spirituality? What does spiritual mean? Spirituality is an imaginative euphoria. And if you’re lacking that in your life – which is the stuff of life – then that is a technical problem.
The solution is not to believe in nonsense, but to fix what is psychologically wrong with you. It means living as naturally as possible, eating the right foods, building a meaningful life, or following a dream. It doesn’t mean believing that when you die you get a château and a fancy new hat.
Christians would have you believe that they are healthy and sane, whereas seculars are “defective” or “soulless” or “unhappy.” But this sounds like projection; Christians will say anything to push their point of view. If you can find some way to connect believing in God to = good / smart / successful / funny / fertile / moral / humble / lindy, they will take it. Some of them even imply that, in fact, yes – their religion is nonsense, but they believe it anyway.
The truth is, most people don’t really care about Christianity. It is held together by a core of true believers who dedicate their lives to its proliferation. These people are mentally unstable, and they need Christianity to fix their anxiety and trauma. If you actually talk to people who are really big into Jesus – the people who actually obsess about the religion and autistically consume its lore – those people are not doing so well. They’re very timid, and Jesus gives them the courage to be bigger, get out of their comfort zone, and be a responsible member of society. They are sensitive, and usually very nice, intelligent people. But this, for them, is therapy. It is the closest thing that these people will ever have to a sense of acceptance or parental love.
Europeans were just held hostage by these people, and when the Church lost its grip, they bolted for the doors. That’s what happened. Because it’s the same as spending your Saturday listening to the history of Christopher Columbus. It might be interesting to Academic Agent, but not so much to your common bumpkin. Christianity’s soul is found in the activist archetype.
Sure, most people who go to church are normal. But that’s just because they think it’s something that they have to do. They may even like the atmosphere and the stories, but come on, no one really cares about the Mother Mary idolatry controversy, or SSPX, or whether the Shroud of Turin was real or not. That stuff makes for a great iceberg video, but it’s not something that your mom or her sister is thinking about.
And so you shouldn’t get religion confused with the supernatural. Nationalism is a “faith” all on its own, but to somehow liven it with God is to jump to hasty conclusions. You don’t need God to have a puritanical obsession with white people. Recall that Marxism took over half the planet, and is still around to this day.
Moreover, what is the world but a bunch of objects? The objects move around in the way that they actually do, they don’t have to follow manmade “rules.” So the idea that the right ‘needs a leader’ is to violate all common sense. Leadership makes no sense in an atomized, egalitarian medium like the internet. This is to say that power must be acquired through some alternative method – though the specifics of what that is, that’s another subject.
Moreover (again), Paganism is clearly just a form of ancestor worship. It’s not about seriously bringing such and such cult to the political arena, it’s about connecting with one’s ancestors. I wouldn’t take it so seriously, beyond aesthetics. I happen to like it, but I understand it’s not so important.
Moreover moreover moreover, you cannot decide what religion the far right is going to have. It’s a deracinated space. Conformity was once enforced through peer pressure and authority games. The internet is a place where anyone can say and do whatever they want. So the keystone HAS to be something that we all have in common. And that would be politics. If you love white people, you’re in. And if you don’t, you’re at best a nuisance and at worst an enemy that must be defeated.
Moreover moreover moreover moreover, the best policy for a white ethnostate, as the Germans themselves realized, is religious freedom (that is, within reason). I would vehemently encourage OUR GUYS – however many are open to the idea – to explore materialism and the Rational Scientific Method. After all, that is the only way to make sense of philosophy, psychology, and other high-level topics of metapolitical import. But I understand that such ideas make little sense when they are first presented.
My wrists hurt and I have to go now. I apologize if I was in any way rude, to anyone, in this response.




