West Europids and East Europids are two different races.

Metapolitics & General
1

West Europids and East Europids are two different races from two very different climate regions. The rainfall patterns in West Europe are massively different from those of East Europe as the rainfall is generally much higher in the period between September and March (the two equinoxes) when it comes to West Europe, whereas the rainfall is generally much higher in the opposite period (March to September) in East Europe. East Europids and West Europids have massively different cultures and languages. An albino West Europid from a place such as Lebanon or Southern Italy, could most likely survive well in a place with similar rainfall and temperatures in northwestern Norway. But an albino East Europid from Southeastern Europe (such as Bulgaria) would likely only survive well in a place with similar rainfall and temperatures in East Europe, such as Murmansk in northern Russia, rather than the previously mentioned place in northwestern Norway. Similarly, a light skinned East Europid from Murmansk could probably survive well in a cave in Bulgaria as the rainfall patterns etc. are similar. But that East Europid from Murmansk may not do so well in a cave in Lebanon, which is a southerly West Europid land. Humans are structurally very similar, so after a similar number of years of adapting to a given climate, one would expect them to generally look similar, or at least not generally be structurally uniquely similar to the typical human population that has genetically adapted to a different climate over thousands of years of continuously inhabiting that region.

Adolf Hitler even noticed the massive difference between East Europids and West Europids in terms of behavior. He wrote in the Mein Kampf “One ought to cast the utmost doubt on the state-building power of the Slavs.” And having looked at the paternal lineages of remains of people from ancient communities of Eastern Europe, it seems that those with East Europid lineages such as R1a often joined in existing societies dominated by West Europids with lineages such as R1b. Such societies existed in East Europe around 4,000 years ago while the Indo-European peoples were expanding westward.

However, in time, East Europid “Aryans” would come to dominate East Europe while West Europid “Aryans” would continue westward to the larger portion of West Europe. West Europid “Aryans” largely either died off or abandoned East Europe (which encompasses lands such as Belarus). R1a diverged from R1b over 20,000 years ago, before the Native Americans arrived in the Americas. Even before the “Aryan” migration, R1b and R1a were largely geographically split. R1a comes from further east and northeast, in lands that were closer to eastern Finland and the Caspian Sea, whose western shore forms the eastern coast of the “Aryan” origin land. On the other hand, R1b comes from further west within this “Aryan” origin land, near its west coast on the Black Sea and the Sea of Azov. Do you remember the Sochi 2014 Winter Olympics? Sochi is a city in that western portion of the “Aryan” homeland. And as one may expect, it gets little to no snowfall, and about 80% of the snow used in the 2014 Winter Olympics was actually artificial. This demonstrates that just like the Western European eastern shores of the Atlantic Ocean in temperate places such as Ireland, Britain, France, and Portugal, the western portion of the “Aryan” origin land (which lies on the eastern shores of the Black Sea and the Sea of Azov) is also a temperate land. The city of Temryuk, Russia gets its highest rainfall in the winter, just like much of Western Europe, and therefore should be considered to be in “West Europe” (broader than the climatically arbitrary “Western Europe”). The linguistic divide is also massive, consider for example the word for Urine. It is similar across many West European languages. Yet it is “Moocha” or something similar in many East European languages such as Russian. “Moocha” is also a word for urine in Sanskrit, a Vedic “Aryan” language that came from some East Europids who went even further east (and south) and mixed into the Indid race in South Asia.
And look at a genetic map of European populations. You will see that the West European populations cluster on a line of their own, and the East European populations cluster on a separate but parallel line. In between the two is a line that connects the two parallel lines, and the plotted points make a slanted “H” like shape. The line that connects the two parallel diagonal lines is the line that represents the biracial Europid populations of places such as Germany (a biracial nation, Germans are not a singular monoracial ethnicity, there are East Germans and West Germans). However, even then one can see that many Germans cluster closer to the West European line. I am linking the article in which the genetic map/chart I described is present.
European Journal of Human Genetics article: Investigation of the fine structure of European populations with applications to disease association studies
Scroll down to figure 3 to see the genetic map/chart I am referring to.
https://www.nature.com/articles/ejhg2008210/figures/3

2

This is very interesting. What are your thoughts on the racial constitution of South America?

3

By and large I feel that it’s better to lump the Europid races together (although I agree with much of what you’re saying here) for survival/civilizational reasons, but I understand the sentiment around emphasizing HBD.

I’m also curious on your thoughts on Latin America.

4

That is a complicated subject on which I know much less about. I will try to come back with a response later, but for now I can say that South America has a mix of West European, West African, East Asian, South Asian, and indigenous peoples. Many South Americans are mestizos, meaning they have some indigenous ancestry but are mixed with West European ancestry (usually from Spain or Portugal). Argentina may be a bit different as there are actually quite a lot of fully West European-descent people there. Interestingly, many of the indigenous groups of the far south of South America adapted to their conditions in similar ways to how the indigenous groups of northwestern Europe adapted to their conditions. For example, such southern South American indigenous peoples are often quite stocky, somewhat similar to Neanderthals and the Irish who both inhabited/inhabit regions that are relatively cold year-round. And also like the Irish and Neanderthals, many southern South American indigenous people are shorter than many groups elsewhere. Whereas southern South American indigenous peoples generally ate quite a lot of meat (like Europeans), many indigenous South Americans from further north (around Paraguay) had a more plant-based diet as it was sub-tropical/tropical. This sort of pattern is seen in Afro-Eurasia as well, with groups further from the equator traditionally eating more meat than many groups closer to the equator.
I have also read that there are many Middle Eastern people in Argentina specifically.

5

During Hitler’s time, Eastern Europeans looked like savages to the Western Europeans.

During our time, Eastern Europeans have significantly better education than Western Europeans. Eastern Europeans contribute a lot more to science and technology, per capita, than Western Europeans.

In addition, the “meanness” factor of Eastern Europeans is mostly gone. There is still something remaining of it that people call “bluntness,” but this does not feel like coldness. There is a Romanian community near me, so I know what it feels like, exactly. There is still probably some kind of criminal underworld in Romania (there’s a reason Andrew Tate likes it there) but in general Romanians are quite high-achieving, and the same is true for many other Eastern Europeans.

Basically, the HBD stuff about Slavs being retards is just false.

The main reason they were violent and stupid in the past was probably that they were incredibly pissed off about being dominated by Jews. Multiculturalism has a way of making homo sapiens be miserable. Multiculturalism presents great evolutionary threats, and we did not evolve to be perfectly happy losing the evolutionary game.