To be a real white is to be leftie. To contradict this is to be atypical, abnormal and everything but average. Don’t you ever question why your ideals have to be so underground and hidden? Your ideals are unpopular because you’re the odd one out. You are the nail that sticks out too far. If you were really like your peers, your ideals would simply be normal and mainstream. There wouldn’t be an overwhelming opposition against you.
“Yeah well it’s the jews fault!”
Yeah, well, who fell for it? Who is still falling for it? You keep thinking that one day whites will wake up. That one day they will see the manipulation for what it is, but they won’t. Whites are the abused girlfriend to an abusive Jewish boyfriend but the reality is these girlfriends want the abuse. They know they’ve been hurt and deceived but they don’t care if they’re beaten or lied to. They want to do the right thing. They want to be the savior. The chosen one who can fix him and the world. They don’t want to be rescued because they are perfectly willing to die trying and even happier to become a martyr.
A white leftie will call themselves evil colonizers. Ok, sure, fair but why do they excuse everyone else even if they do the same things? Because it’s not only about guilt. It’s a savior complex with a possessive streak. When non-whites oppose progressivism whites become furious. They start calling them slurs, calling them racist, calling them whatever they can. Whites want to be punished for colonizing but they want everyone to collectively feel sorry with them and they want everyone to die with them. This isn’t a sacrifice or an attempt to save anyone; it’s a mass suicide.
This is what I’d like to call the “Jim Jones Syndrome”. Jim preached for perfect virtue and diversity only to end his mission with mass suicide. He’s the perfect example of a true white. Jim Jones Syndrome is not only a feature of whiteness but a feature of femininity. A lot of women of any race have this and white women have it especially worse. When a person feels enough guilt they may become suicidal. They convince themselves the world is so unbearably painful that death is a “gift.” A woman usually does not kill her child but when she does, she does it to “protect them” from the harsh realities of the world. Likewise a woman usually does not give up her child for adoption no matter how unfit as a mother she sees herself as. The scary thing about Jim Jones Syndrome is they are a suicidal human who fears dying alone more than they hate life itself. To be honest if you lack this inner evilness I think you should be proud of yourself but if you lack this when your group usually possesses it, I believe in the best way possible there’s something very unusual about you.
I see what you mean.
My “fellow Whites” having basically 0 nationalism is part of why I am hesitant to describe myself as a White Nationalist.
Instead, I prefer the term “White racist”.
As a matter of fact, I might even argue that Whites dislike each other. Whites prefer to hire cheap browns over their own people. Niggers are expected to chimpout, so a White who chimps out may very well get a harsher punishment from his fellows, since the behavior is unexpected.
Um, I am a retard so i apologize in advance for the autistic “ERRRM AKTUALLY” that I am about to say:
Jim Jones cult actually mostly died from murder. Over half were shot, stabbed, ect.
Only some “willingly” drank the poison, and even then, they were forced at gun point.
Maybe some did willingly drink it, but at that point, they probably just wanted it to be over. Wanted to be free from Jim Jones.
Alright, historical autism rant correction over. Sorry about that, but I cannot help myself.
Anyway um, I want to disagree with these rather bleak views you have, but I can’t think of a counter arguement.
Like, nothing ever seems to happen. 
I think this accurately describes most Christian or Leftist Whites in their need to rehabilitate other racial groups, harming their own progress as a result. But most White Nationalists I know of don’t really blame Jews, as the quote goes “A country has the Jews it deserves.”
It is correct that we should take accountability for the extent to which we have brought this upon ourselves, but that should not stop us from striving to hold other groups accountable for their own collective behavior.
White Lefties still implicitly admit to racial superiority by trying to step in and solve all conflicts, they still unconsciously see themselves in that position, whereas modern White Nationalists are more about simple separation, and not trying to play world police, they just want to be left alone to do their own thing.
I would also say that this more suicidal behavior is a modern development, Whites historically did not want to kill themselves, the closer they were connected to their roots the better off they were.
Your last bit on Women and their children might be a bit off, especially given SIDs and the whole Clancy thing, many Women, White Black Brown Jew or whatever, will kill their kids these days for the slightest inconvenience, it’s not so much about protecting the children from worse evil but removing an obstacle in the way of the Womans self gratification. That’s how unhealthy we are today.
White Nationalist doesn’t necesarrily entail American Nationalism or the like, especially when so many of our modern government have failed us. Rather it is the aspiration to have a Nation that one truly feels patriotic about, though yes, many do not get this far, but then again those Many or are usually Hispanic.
Whites are still held to a higher standard because people always implicitly admit to racial bias without realizing it. A child is permitted to throw a tantrum but an adult is not, thus Whites are not allowed to act up as much because everybody expects better behavior from them, and thus penalizes them more.
By willingly I mainly meant the girlfriend hypothetical and Jim Jones himself rather than his followers. Though his followers perfectly demonstrate what happens when you let people like this have their way. I may have accidentally implied all tolerance to manipulation is willing but really that only applies half of the time. Sometimes manipulation really is the simple spreading of misinformation with victims who unfortunately believed but there is a handful of victims who understand their situation and see through lies easily. Those victims are willing accomplices.
Your last bit on Women and their children might be a bit off, especially given SIDs and the whole Clancy thing, many Women, White Black Brown Jew or whatever, will kill their kids these days for the slightest inconvenience, it’s not so much about protecting the children from worse evil but removing an obstacle in the way of the Womans self gratification. That’s how unhealthy we are today.
SIDS is a real thing that doesn’t occur intentionally. As for the rest of this, I think this is root of their cruel irony. The figure they’re overprotective of is the same figure they’re hurting. They’re fixated on protecting, when they themselves pose the greatest danger. A lot of times someone’s desire to “protect” is actually a desire control.
Another aspect is how “freedom” is a major part of their code of virtue. Freedom is a fixation on what advances one’s own personal autonomy. Seeing whatever grants them more opportunities as just and whatever limits it as unjust. I think this can demonstrate how modern culture sees freedom itself as more virtuous than the avoidance of murder. Even the way sex is censored in films but violence rarely is. Violence and murder is actually rather glorified. Violence is actually depicted as a expression of agency. If virtue = maximizing personal options, then murder isn’t inherently wrong. It’s only wrong if it limits the killer’s future options (via punishment or guilt) or violates the victim’s autonomy (but the victim is now gone, so their autonomy is moot). Women are actually doing what they’ve been taught is most virtuous however we have a horrific definition of virtue. I’ll write more on this in another post as I have more to say about it.
I would also say that this more suicidal behavior is a modern development, Whites historically did not want to kill themselves, the closer they were connected to their roots the better off they were.
I agree what I’ve been describing is a modern phenomenon but it’s a modern expression of the same ancient roots. By my own logic, isn’t baffling a group so sensitive to guilt colonized at all? But actually it goes deeper than that. What causes this fixation on being the worlds savior or martyr is the same that causes colonization. It’s not just a sole desire to fix the world but an obsessive need towards having purpose and a greater discomfort of lacking said purpose. It’s basically an inability to do nothing. Look up how whites are more prone to having “adventurer genes”.
https://www.nationalgeographic.com/adventure/article/extreme-athletes-risk-taking
“Though scientists are still trying to understand how this genetic variant may affect one’s physiology, it’s believed that it influences how the body processes dopamine, a neurotransmitter involved in pleasure-seeking and reward-motivated behaviors. Dopamine is behind the high one feels when charging down a spicy backcountry slope or climbing a sheer rock face—or when using drugs. In fact, the neurotransmitter is linked to drug addiction.”
“…a person with more of these receptors experiences a greater burst of dopamine during intense situations, making the rush feel that much better than that of some with an average number of receptors. This exaggerated sensation could reinforce the behavior and make that individual more likely to do it again because it feels so good.”
Dopamine is the brain’s primary driver of motivation, anticipation, and “incentive salience” (the process by which the brain assigns intense importance or value to a specific idea, cue, or goal). High or dysregulated dopamine activity can contribute to an obsession with finding a grand purpose or meaning. Likewise cave diving is a white man’s sport. There’s nothing but death at the end of that tunnel yet they simply enter the tunnel because “that hole was built for them”.
It’s a catchall term used when they don’t know or don’t want to reveal the cause of death.
Women uphold the values they’ve been imbued with, so yes, they are deeply sick because they lack father figures and strong role models, and they don’t have a healthy culture or heritage to emulate.
I think what we understand as Unhealthy is simply faulty wiring of otherwise healthy impulses. Women desire to protect and nurture, therefor they can be manipulated to care for things that aren’t actually healthy like Animals and Immigrants.
I don’t think it’s baffling how a group susceptible guilt colonized the world. Our evolutionary success is born from our capacity to produce high trust societies, high EQ or Empathetic Individuals. Without this trait we would have never developed the nurturing abilities that allowed us to create strong individuals, and for the majority of history this worked quite well. Only in recent times, this drive has been hijacked by our racial competitors, and we fail to see the eugenic purpose of it.
Our fixation on being the World Police or Global Arbiters is a collective responsibility as higher performing individuals, a manifestation of our greatest strength and greatest weakness. If we expand nature to the level of a macrocosm, other races are essentially underdeveloped children. Do higher IQ higher Trust individuals not have the same role as Parents and Stewards to protect them? To end their practices of slavery, cannibalism, widow burning, etc?
Not to say I agree with this, but that is the consideration.
Our adventure gene is a contributor to our success. Would we have written history if we just stayed in Europe? Would we have contributed so much to the worlds inventions and discoveries? Whites literally recovered other peoples entire Languages and Alphabets, like for example James Prinsep deciphering the Brahmi Script.
We’re not flawless, no organism is, and we should get our negate traits under control. However, we are a great people who have done great things, and when we die, a whole hell of a lot of the World will go with us, its inhabitants, its history, its invention, its understanding of nature, everything.
What we’re experiencing now is our evolutionary hurdle. We need to prune these genetic weaknesses from our blood, and by so doing, raise a new generation that is stronger and better equipped than we were.
Our fixation on being the World Police or Global Arbiters is a collective responsibility as higher performing individuals, a manifestation of our greatest strength and greatest weakness. If we expand nature to the level of a macrocosm, other races are essentially underdeveloped children. Do higher IQ higher Trust individuals not have the same role as Parents and Stewards to protect them? To end their practices of slavery, cannibalism, widow burning, etc?
Scientifically advanced aliens could come down to Earth and say the same things about us. To them we would be the underdeveloped child. They might be logical but they’re incredibly patronizing. Also whatever happened to self-improvement? Why does some 3rd party actor have to come rescue everyone? Why can’t people rescue themselves? Anyone who rescues and protects a dependent will ultimately just control them and erase their personhood. It’s much better humanity strives to be as independent as possible.
Whites literally recovered other peoples entire Languages and Alphabets, like for example James Prinsep deciphering the Brahmi Script.
You act like those discoveries mean something. Like it’s kinda cool in a linguistic science sort of way but it’s nothing that couldn’t be remade with sheer theory and it’s ultimately useless. It’s like getting excited when you found a child’s secret piece of art they made. This is literally a pile of glitter and dried macaroni, what are you so hyped up about?
Sure the inventions are cool but I chalk most of that up to neuroticism. They made cool things cause they felt desperate. As new inventions get more complex and require larger teams this is one trick pony of innovative neuroticism lost it’s novelty. Now we’re just stuck with neuroticism without utility. This was all the just the wonder of an asynchronous development. Whites were the gifted child of the world and now that they’ve grown up and played out all their cards and gifts, they’ve dried up and burnt out.
What we’re experiencing now is our evolutionary hurdle. We need to prune these genetic weaknesses from our blood, and by so doing, raise a new generation that is stronger and better equipped than we were.
I think my main point is the race you idolize isn’t white, it’s a future post-race that doesn’t exist yet. To improve this race, it has to dissolve itself and rebrand into a new form. It’s no longer the same thing.
So atypicality is fraudulence?
I agree. So then colonialism and White Saviors is a natural part of our development. We have to learn the effects of this so that we can overcome it, and that’s probably why Whites resorted to White Guilt, assuming that if other races did not develop like Whites did, it must surely have been our fault for interfering in their progression. Of course now we are learning that it doesn’t really have much to do with us, these other groups will simply act in whatever way is natural to them regardless of any outside input. It’s sort of like we were getting ready to achieve Godhood, and we asked if anyone else wanted to come along, and they said no, so now here we are, we have to make the decision to go on without them.
This might be why Aliens haven’t interfered with us, not because we haven’t overcome our capacity for Hate, but because we haven’t overcome our capacity to Love. We have to learn to not see ourselves in everyone and every thing, and advocate for our own wellbeing above all others.
As far as James Prinseps discovery, it was simply an example of the fact that Whites have basically done a lot of things that other groups simply couldn’t do, including preserving and recovering aspects of other peoples history that they had forgotten.
We made cool things because we wanted to make cool things.
Your argument is essentially what anyone says whenever you advocate for yourself or your values “Oh you’re just projecting.” “You want to hold black people accountable for their crimes because deep down you’re just insecure with yourself.”
It’s a very pessimistic Freudian worldview that you have. Who cares if desperation fueled our desires? Either way we achieved great things that nobody else did, and we did it for the love of the game.
“Oh, you’re only making money because you’re insecure about becoming poor-” it’s just absurd.
New inventions are only going to be achieved by high performance groups, the size of the group means nothing. They need 100 Indians in a room to simulate 1 White Man at a drawing board. And the only reason things have declined is because our countries, our environments, are no longer conducive to our success, no longer panders to our biology, because they favor lower performing individuals in the name of egalitarianism.
We haven’t dried up or burnt out, we’re going through growing pains.
The future race I envision is invariably comprised of the White Genetic lines of today. Saying it isn’t the same thing is like saying that an Apple Seed isn’t the same as the Tree is sprung from.
I despise Nogs and don’t want them anywhere near my people.
I’m not trying to say that results don’t matter, they do but I’m digging into the motives so deeply because I’m trying to find a pattern. The better I understand the process, the better I understand how to achieve better future results. I’m trying to cut all the fat down to understand the situation the only way I know how. It’s not that the motives are impure and therefore invalid per se it’s more like I’m trying to make some sort of framework to work with. When I say “someone fears x” but “desires y” or has a “z complex” I’m building a framework where I easily understand the push-pull dynamic. In a way I’m not reducing things down to morals but to movement or rather physics. Insecurity, desperation, love,etc is just one vector among many. An apple is not just an apple. An apple is a collection of fibers. Fibers are a collection of atoms. Atoms are a collection of math and math is a collection of theory. I’m not trying to say the apple is bad just that I don’t see it as a solid thing. Identifying the wind speed simply to find out why a leaf blew left or right.
So when I say it’s all desperation, I’m not trying invalidate but rather it’s my framework for why I see them as the “gifted child”. It’s mainly just my intuition but I’m feeling a velocity that will slow down and lower. Like when you say the culture is to blame for why innovation slowed down, I see it as interdependent/circular logic kind of logic. The variables that cause undesirable cultures are the same variables that cause rapid innovation. It’s not that the fuel behind things is “bad” it’s that the fuel is finite. Desperation fuels the rise; exhaustion fuels the fall. The candle that burns twice as bright burns half as long not because the candle is bad, but because physics.
(The discovery part was a bit invalidating. My bad. I’m a bit cranky.)
Yesn’t.
The way I see it is how do we determine what differentiates a bat from a bird. Cause realistically I see race as a kind of label and if you’re going to use labels you should define it thoroughly. So I made a definition up that felt right.
This is good. We are different. We ought to be conscious of it, and ought to take it seriously. We ought to be mindful of the ways that being different can make us angry.