I’ve listened to a bunch of the episodes and there’s a laser focus on internet radicalization. I’ve heard that there’s some Thiel money involved; what’s going on here?
Maybe I’m badjacketing, but every episode is about how Nazis are naive, wayward kids with a lot of pent-up rage. Seems very forced.
Angry Tweet that I deleted:
So I started listening to @JoshuaCitarella’s Doomscroll Podcast. I noticed that all of the episodes had a laser focus on containing people like me – racist extremists.
I would say that the people interviewed in these episodes are clearly gifted, but none of them seem to have any idea what our problem is.
The far right is very disengaged from economics. So clearly our economic opportunities are not any kind of motivating factor in our decision to abandon liberal society. They may influence us in the sense that we have nothing to lose, but they aren’t the reason why we feel this way.
We just hate liberals. We don’t want to share a society with them. Liberals, especially activist liberals, are anti-normative people who hate everything that is stable and natural. (See the graph).
Improving our economic opportunities won’t make us go away. A quarter of a million British girls have been raped, and this is very personal. We want all of the people who allowed this to happen to be put in jail.
There is no reason to have empathy for people who hate you. This is a narcissistic relationship, and Europeans deserve better than this. We don’t care if you think we’re not a “real” people, we don’t even view YOU as fully formed individuals. I don’t want to be rude, but the very way that you look, talk, dress, present, etc is unsettling. There is something deeply disturbing about your very appearance; I get uncomfortable looking at the art of Andy Rementer or Michael DeForge. I’m sorry, but we just don’t like your type. You’re just kind of creepy people, and this antipathy we have is more ingrained than you could ever imagine. You are dysgenic, and from our perspective, that must be the source of the anti-normative sentiment.
I generalize, but you are just “weird” and you instinctively identify with the outgroup. The reason why so many of you feel for the sufferings of freaks is because you yourselves can relate. So fundamentally you are pro-outgroup, and thus anti-normal. You elevate outgroups while neglecting or even subverting the ingroup.
Obviously, I am not a normal person either. I have been discriminated against for being autistic my entire life. The difference is that I don’t have anti-normative sentiments, and I don’t care about aspie rights or aspie tolerance or anything like that. Not everything is about me. I identify with the in-group, who are, for all their faults, the good and sensible people.
Real tolerance starts with yourself. If you’re a freak and you pretend to be a white-presenting heteronormative “equal,” then you are fake, you are a manipulator. I accept myself for being less competent, less attractive, less graceful, and less sexually moral. I am inferior, or below average in many highly important respects.
Accepting yourself doesn’t translate to political power. Inferior groups do not get the time of day. But we have seen what happens when inferior groups are passed off as upstanding citizens: the result is insanity. This is an insane society, and we just want it to be sane. Not fair, not inspiring or futuristic or even wealthy – just sane. Forget capitalism – I agree with you about capitalism. The texture of life is garbage. It is so removed from nature / normal that nobody even wants to go outside or socialize. Leftists, oddly enough, have socially conservative grievances – concepts like alienated labor, the third place, car culture, the nuclear family, etc – these are socially conservative issues. So obviously they are detecting this issue. They just can’t accept that “progress” has consequences, and that these problems go far beyond economics.
You are deracinating society and making it crazy. Human health and happiness is based in a wide variety of sensitive routines. Disturb these routines and you get side effects. Nature =/= good, because “good” is an opinion, but if you disturb natural modes of organization, do not be shocked when people get angry. If you mess with hornets, they will sting you. “Nazis” are not ‘victims’ of late-stage capitalism, they are just the DRONES. You are messing up our nest, and we want you to go away.
Another subversive channel
“Improving our economic opportunities won’t make us go away. A quarter of a million British girls have been raped, and this is very personal. We want all of the people who allowed this to happen to be put in jail.”
Think of the neoliberal(neoliberal≠ socially liberal, it’s more or less oligarchical lassiez-faire capitalism with government cooperation) capitalists who lobbied for their political puppets to pass policies that led to situations like this, and tell me that economics isn’t a factor in the Great Replacement. Cheap labor costs and lower wages for immigrants destabilize native working-class solidarity, as well as through the introduction of culturally unfamiliar newcomers. Additionally, neoconservatives in the West (mainly the US, UK, France, and Israel) start foreign wars for resources, benefiting the ruling bourgeoisie, which leads to refugee crises and further migration to the West, particularly Europe. Economics is absolutely a factor when looking at the flow of capital.
“We just hate liberals. We don’t want to share a society with them. Liberals, especially activist liberals, are anti-normative people who hate everything that is stable and natural. (See the graph).”
Furthermore, people’s politics aren’t always binary. It’s important to be nuanced and recognize that individuals can hold both conservative and liberal stances and viewpoints. Not all conservatives and liberals hate each other; it’s often their vocal minority that incites hatred. Also it’s a heatmap, not a graph(says it in the text that goes alongside it).
“‘We’ just hate liberals. ‘We’ don’t want to share a society with them.”
“‘We’ don’t care if you think ‘we’re’ not a “real” people, ‘we’ don’t even view YOU as fully formed individuals.”
Who is “we” here? Are you speaking on behalf of a collective group that you know personally of through experience, or is that just your personal sentiment that you’re putting out there towards the strawmen?
“Obviously, I am not a normal person either. I have been discriminated against for being autistic my entire life. The difference is that I don’t have anti-normative sentiments, and I don’t care about aspie rights or aspie tolerance or anything like that. Not everything is about me. I identify with the in-group, who are, for all their faults, the good and sensible people.”
Your stance of supporting the in-group, despite being oppressed by them for your autism, is akin to a native Zimbabwean man rooting for the white apartheid-era Rhodesia after his family just fought against them for independence. It betrays your own struggle and reflects self-denial rather than self-acceptance. How can they be “the good and sensible people” if many of them have unfairly targeted you for something beyond your control(your autism)?
“There is no reason to have empathy for people who hate you. This is a narcissistic relationship.” Same thing again, it’s abusive/narcissistic to make it your philosophy to expressly follow a group that abets people that oppressed you for having autism.
“Real tolerance starts with yourself. If you’re a freak and you pretend to be a white-presenting heteronormative “equal,” then you are fake, you are a manipulator. I accept myself for being less competent, less attractive, less graceful, and less sexually moral. I am inferior, or below average in many highly important respects.” Why must you feel like an imposter if you try to look at your traits in a positive light? If you believe you are “inferior,” take the initiative to improve yourself. Focus on self-improvement and growth to build confidence and enhance your life. Don’t settle for negative labels—work on becoming the best version of yourself.
Also you never got to how if Doomscroll is a fed op or not.
Hi, welcome to the forum. Thank you for being polite, just remember to check out this article on debating other users, as being nasty can get you kicked:
First of all, I do very much agree that economics plays a major role in the Great Replacement. In fact, I’m not really that anti-Communist, and I am largely sympathetic to socialist / Marxist opinions. I also think that the “horrors” of Communism are largely exaggerated or outright falsified. This being said, I do not identify as a leftist.
My real problem with these kinds of people is their anti-normativity. If they are discriminated against for being autistic, then they want to change society or get some sort of revenge.
I see freaks as an unfortunate reality of nature. They are excluded for a reason, and implementing their freakishness causes society to decay. It does not result in this picture right here:
This is actually because it is a white, heteronormative vision. It is pretending that the freaks don’t ACTUALLY have all sorts of problems that make society fall apart. An autistic person under this scheme totally isn’t lazy, unhygienic, disturbing, and sexually creepy – they are “misunderstood” ie they are actually identical to you!
This is psychotic thinking. And the result is a disorganized, unhappy society where crime and vice are rampant.
The truth is, the reason why I have been “oppressed” is because I do not belong in this society. My presence actually holds society down by making it harder for everyone. So it’s actually not society that should feel bad for me, it is me that should feel bad for society, for having to put up with me at all. That’s what it actually means to be a freak. You just kind of suck, and you either accept that about yourself, or you pretend that you don’t suck and that you’re entitled to a date with the popular girl.
By “we” I’m really referring to myself and other nationalists.
I do not know if the show is a psy op. I just feel like it’s really forced and has a laser focus on deradicalizing white men.
