Oliver Cromwell along with William the Conquerer, Alfred the Great, William of Orange, and Hengist and Horsa are foundational figures to the identities of the British Isles, and the distinction between them.
We are aware of W. of Oranges and William the Conqueror’s open co-operation with moneylenders (and that can be implied that they have occult ties) to succeed. Cromwell also has these same ties as the previous two I mentioned, but on top of this he has a belief of of dispensationalism.
Now the interesting thing about dispensationalism is that it popped up after the Knights Templar was unestablished. I don’t know much about it but in the same fashion the Roscicrucian Manifesto appeared to be written by an anonymous author in “The Fame of the Brotherhood of RC” in 1614, there is also written in 1316 a Latin text titled “The History of Brother Dolcino”. If we step aside quickly, I have also noted that there where no “occult adjacent/heretical” sects that I can find during the dark ages, which I think implies the more rural and peaceful time it was. So what I find particularly interesting is that the Crusades where the moment where religious organisations which had allegations of occult practice began to spring up. I will step aside again and mention that before the crusades occurred, William the Conquerer, Miamonides, and Charlemange and the Siege of Toledo all preceded them by a meaningfully small period of time, and all these figures, in my opinion shaped the character of Europe greatly, Especially Miamonides being the foundation stone of modern day Talmudic extremism and William the Conquerer shaping the relation between the British Elite and it’s populace.
Perhaps these figures didn’t shape Europe. Anyway I’m cutting this thread short because I want to know the link between Cromwell and Rosicrucianism.