The Dissident Right is Dead

Metapolitics & General
1

Yes, it is really dead. All of the fun and the energy has been bled out of this community. The timeline just sucks, and there’s nothing surprising or interesting getting posted anymore.

Let’s get real, ok: this is not a “dissident” movement, this is a subculture. This is consumerism, self-expression. It is not a “dangerous force” that is shaking up the political system.

Art zines are not political dissent. Homesteading is not political dissent. Mainstream acceptance is not political dissdent. These are all games, get real bro!

This fact is extremely obvious, but for some reason, people don’t want to look at it dead in the face. It’s like they feel deep down inside that behind the games, there is no hope.

I do have hope, but I want people to face their fear: yes, we do not actually know how to achieve white nationalism. We cannot figure out how to “do something” without it devolving into some kind of larp.

Well, when you don’t know what to do, you FIGURE IT OUT! So right there, that’s your first step. Why does everything become a larp? What is the opposite of a larp? What is the criteria for authentic activism? Figure out these questions, and some doors finally start to open.

Marxists have known about this problem forever. But no one in this community ever talks about it, because they don’t believe in their own ability to solve problems. They’re all helpless. They all want some strongman (an e-celeb) to come out of the sky and do the thinking for them.

The answer is that capitalism continuously disturbs our routines. Mass movements require carefully perfected routines that normally develop under stagnant conditions. Modern society is simply too dynamic for things like a secret society – after two years, everyone moves to a new state or gets distracted by something else.

So this idea about entrenching yourself in your local community, and doing charitable works, and having an alt right household – like that’s just make-believe. That stuff would have worked in the 1920s, back when communities were still sophisticated.

This is what you’re faced with today:

usa

What “community” is here to “entrench oneself” in? There’s nothing. It’s just a bunch of random objects. There’s no harmony, and thus no “in.”

2

This is a draft, will edit later.

3

An obsession with novelty often causes us to lose sight of what we are really after. At a certain point, what more can be said? The time for catchy words and edgy info-graphics is over, we have the information, now its time for us to act on it, putting our convictions into practice in building communities and improving ourselves as individuals.

Jeets like GypsyCrusader and others have monetized a lot of the movement and turned it into a genre, degrading the higher spiritual expressions we otherwise aspire to, but grifters will always do this with every movement, everywhere, no matter what. Spiritual jewry is a virus, but if you fall pray to that same addiction to novelty, you’ve already fell into the arms of the enemy.

Sincerity of action vs contrivance is something that can only be defined through action, for as the saying goes, actions speak louder than words. Marxists can not be sincere by the nature of their ideology, which places ideological truths over Natural truths. From this premise alone, we have the utmost degree of hope and potential, something our enemies can never hope to aspire to.

If you don’t want to get disrupted by the machine, you have to work exceptionally hard to cultivate habits that will lead to that greater end. It will not be an easy task, but discipline holds salvation for all of us. Stop giving in to bad habits: Stop eating goyslop, stop consuming media, stop spending your time on grifters and celebrity worship, stop sitting on your ass.
Start exercising, start reading and studying history, start cultivating skills, start learning to communicate and network with others, start a family, raise strong children, or just in general, find a way to help the kinds of things you want to support. In person organization is the best, and I always recommend that people find local groups in their area if available.

4

I don’t think we have the information. There is simply no clear path to power.

So one has to be discovered.

5

What more information could we be lacking? Do not forget, that action finds meaning in itself.

Socrates himself remarked how Knowledge is not a matter of acquiring something new that has never existed before, but is rather an act of remembering. For there is nothing new under the sun.

We must trust in our blood, and in the testament of our ancestors, speaking to us through history and through our genetics. Cultivating instinct through lived experience, and not these a priori notions of what we ought to do, which can paralyze us with the sheer number of outcomes.

A cliche remark on the root of the word Enthusiasm, whose root, En Theos, means Of/from God, is the notion that if you follow what makes you enthusiastic, you are quite literally following the path God has laid out for you. But how do you expect to find this path if all you do is think about it?
Your feet need to feel the ground beneath you with every step you take, the truth simply reveals itself along the way.

6

Well we have to take over Western governments and institutions. How exactly? What’s the strategy?

And by that I mean the specifics. What is something that we can do right this very moment that will increase our power? I don’t mean generalities like ‘get involved in your community,’ ‘educate yourself,’ ‘form networks,’ etc.

That stuff is tactics with no strategy. The strategy is missing, and it should be a great one.

I think that the political chessboard is very different now. Radicals can no longer take power by conventional means, and the socialists prove this. Socialism is popular and well-instantiated within the institutions. Yet socialists do not actually have a chance of changing the economic system.

This is the internet or information age. Power works more like Ted Chiang’s short story, Understand. It is all about brainpower.

archive.org/details/TedChiangUnderstand

7

Why do we have to take over corrupt institutions whose axioms are inherently anti-thetical to natural distinctions, and the prosperity of our people? I’m not saying its bad to try this, but I don’t see this as instrumental. Historically, these systems collapse, and usually parallel institutions already exist to gain power, or the people continue existing to build new institutions after the fact.

In either case, there are a multitude of things we can do: Get involved in your local college politics, get involved in local government, buy property and learn to homestead, network with local people and organize social activism/fitness meetups/combat training/charity events/potluck events/book clubs/collective land buying, whatever appears to you to be the best thing to do, or whatever is most agreeable to your personal convictions.

The strategy can’t begin to take shape if you’re not on the ground organizing with other people, so the first step if anything might be to find an in person social network, and if you don’t have one around you, either don’t be afraid to advertise yourself, or move to an area that has one.
The most radical thing you can do is attempt to live a healthy and disciplined life, surround yourself with friends of the same likeness, find a partner who shares those values, and begin the grassroots effort, all starting with individual action.

You’re putting the cart before the horse and focusing on the higher level institutional change, but you’re not really focusing on the lower level things that you can do in your personal life to build up to that kind of stuff. Anyone can walk you through the ways to start that movement, or that strategy, but none of those notions are really worth anything if you’re not going to put anything into action.

Using myself as a personal example, simply to spitball here: I’ve bought land, I’ve looked into communities around my area, I exercise, I read, I’ve read a lot of books on homesteading.
Once I get settled into the property, I will start participating in local community efforts, local government, city council, etc. I can network with other people around me through work, mainly helping them with farm stuff as I have experience doing and will likely be working in anyway.
From there I can communicate my morality with others and advocate for systemic changes that are in line with those values, and I reckon a variety of possibilities will open up at that point, but I’m not going to really get to that point if I don’t maintain my baseline first of all.

8

At the end of the day people have to live in cities to get anything done.

9

Ya? Hows that working out for you guys?
Fuentes talks a big game about institutional take-over, while he eats junk food and neglects his body.
And in the end what has any of this achieved? Aside from the brain-drain of invariably losing our own guys to the same corruption, it is absurd to think that you’re somehow going to build a better society when you can’t even manage your own well-being.

The system will naturally starve without us, hell, it’s already starving, and the less Whites participate the nearer it gets to collapse. The issue is about the survival and prosperity of our people, so why are we wasting time committing our lives to institutions that are so inherently corrupted that to even interact with them risks the spread of disease?

Let the system die, we can build something better simply within our own lives.

10

Trust me man, I’ve thought about this for a loooong time.

Think about it like this: imagine that we had $100 million to change something about the City of New York. Would this matter?

No, it would be a drop in the bucket. So homestead / art gallery / parallel university / intentional community – that’s nothing.

So our efforts INDIVIDUALLY have to be as impactful as $100 million positions.

And the only way to be THAT impactful is via intelligence.

Intelligence means economy of action. It’s the number of operations that an object can perform.

The more that you know, the more things that you can do. And the more powerful that you are individually.

Take this to its extreme, and you have Virtuosity.

11

Problem with this is that most likely some really gay organization or power will swoop in before we do. We are all broke and have no strategy

A strategy should scale. It should be something that anyone can do, right now, using almost no effort

I think it’s the internet. It’s right in front of us

12

Who cares? We are a minority on this earth. So long as we are fulfilling our individual obligations we are making tremendous strides. Not everyone is going to make it, and we’re not going to uproot the entire system, but at least securing our own lands and enough people doing the same thing, we can pull through rather well and be resilient to externalities. Consider the Mormon and Amish communities, how few people they had relative to today’s numbers, and look at what they’ve been able to build, not to change the world, America, etc, just to improve their own lives and the lives of their kin.

We don’t need to equal our enemy in monetary value, you’re thinking within the terms of the game the enemy wants you to play, you’re not thinking in terms of Our prosperity.

How are you going to cultivate intelligence in any other meaningful way if you don’t provide for your the baseline of your own existence? IQ is genetic, we have to secure the genetics of our racial kin that lead to higher IQ outcomes. Nothing we do on the internet can preserve these traits.

Knowledge and IQ are not the same thing, somebody can know a lot of things and still be fundamentally low IQ. High IQ people can know only a little and still be far more successful than the former. It’s not about knowledge, its about what you do with that knowledge, how you apply it and the extent of the connections you are able to make.
So, what are you doing with that knowledge? Except sitting around and trying to find more knowledge, as if that is going to change the fundamental position.

13

Again, we don’t need to swoop in, we just need to build our own communities and institutions for our foundations. Who gives a fuck about the rest of the world? Let those fuckers eat eachother, the only thing we need to worry about is preserving our people, building a home for them, a heritage.

We don’t need massive expansive growth, we need autarky, self sustainability.
Natsoc has been arguing on the internet since StormFront in the early 2000s, what possibly are you going to achieve that hasn’t already been accomplished through the internet? You’re saying that we lack a strategy, so what are you proposing as an alternative that we can rely on?

14

Well, the ideal would be to get out of working.

Humor me a little. Assume that something like superintelligence IS possible with the internet (just less sci-fi). And let us assume that this intelligence (or as I call it, virtuosity) has never been attempted. That nobody has realized the full potential of the internet.

Well, if somebody WAS superintelligent, then they would have a much better chance to make it on the stock market.

So there’s step 1 in a path to power.

15

I’ve been practicing this Virtuosity concept for years and you would be amazed the things that I’ve figured out. I have like a thousand pages of original ideas. I simply made an effort to research political and scientific questions every single day.

The problem with the dialectic is that it evolves too slowly. People cling to their priors and do not have the humility necessary to grow. Think about it: virtually no one changes their mind on hardly any subject.

But virtuosity demands that one be corrected over and over and over again endlessly.

You would be amazed how much more intelligent you can become if you simply allow yourself to look stupid. You’re just constantly getting redpilled on all sorts of things that constantly rework your semantic system.

16

Okay, so a superintelligence largely funded by the enemy, who has shills like Alex Karp and a multitude of others using the internet to fund the creation of an intelligence structure so as to replace the need for White People to maintain their societies.
A stock market designed and controlled by Judeo-Masonic interests.

You’re still thinking in their terms, using their powers, their affinities, but what of these mediums speaks to the Aryan Spirit? What of our gifts, our creations, and our affinities?

Again, you’re talking in abstractions and spending hours of your time on intellectual pursuits, but what genuine real world actions have you taken to reach a positive outcome? Are you married? Do you have kids? Do you own land? Do you have any stock in institutions? Any in person networks?
I’ve spent a lot of time researching things too, that experience is ultimately paltry in comparison to the time I’ve spent cultivating skills and doing things that have real world consequences, and genuinely affect the lives of the people around me for the better.

You cannot raise your intelligence, that is not how IQ works. Whatever IQ you have is what you’re born with, its genetic, inherited from your parents. You’re not going to improve your life and establish any real change by simply hoarding knowledge like a drunken dragon for decades on end. Even the low IQ amongst us are far superior to us in many ways, at least to those low IQ people who are sympathetic to our cause and take action, their virtue far outweighs ours, because it is measurable and observable in everything they do, while we sit here merely talking about what we ought to do.

17

I hope I come off as respectful, I’m not dogmatic about this.

They’re arrogant and think that they know everything. Also AI isn’t as smart as people think.

This is what’s available.

We are a scientific race. We invent things, we solve problems, we use our head. What is more Aryan than that?

This is where part of the apprehension comes from. In fact, the internet IS the real world.

If there is an object near you, pick it up and hold it in your hand.

In making my request, I have just made a physical effect upon the real, physical world. We’re far apart, but everything about this arrangement is physical. It’s a different kind of chessboard. The rules work differently.

As I stated elsewhere, intelligence is the number of operations that an object can perform.

IQ is intelligence in a particular context. Same with the g factor.

Humility, sensitivity, persistence, experience, empathy, and so on all add up to one’s true intelligence level.

Moreover, this universe is much simpler to understand than people imagine. See Bill Gaede.

Action emerges when the strategy is solid. I have already started putting money in the stock market.

Sun Tzu said:

Victorious warriors win first and then go to war, while defeated warriors go to war first and then seek to win.

18

The Bill Pill

19

I get your operational mindset here, I’ve been in it- I’m still in it, and for the most part I always will be, but I’ve been diversifying away from it.

In a charitable sense, people are really good investments. For one, the powers that be haven’t found a way to tax good will and paying it forward. Two, if we help the worthiest of our people thrive a lot of them will want to find new challenges. If our best people are trying their hand at big problems, that’s the best we can hope for. Helping friends live their best lives and raising kids right is a force multiplier. My mind won’t last forever, I have to get over my issues and set the next generation up for success.

Thriving is the end goal, but it is also instrumental.

Saying “one of us will solve it” isn’t the most intellectually satisfying, but it is a good base strategy. We still need big plans, but almost everything at scale works on the margins. (TANSTAAFL is north of 90% true.) Some effort needs to be expended on every feasible avenue to sovereign power. Riches, influence, propaganda, cultural coherence- even if they aren’t enough, they are essential. You don’t have a culture to empower without them. There is no victory without the essentials.

Reading that Ted Chiang book years ago probably influenced me a lot. It’s hard to write intelligent characters well, I don’t recall him being too bad at it.

20

I agree, AI isn’t that smart, but that doesn’t stop them from trying, and it is still a weapon being used against us, so feeding into it in any capacity is feeding the enemy.

AI is the antithesis of ingenuity, and these cultural and academic artifices are stultifying in their very nature. AI does not promote creativity, our education system doesn’t promote creativity, none of the institutions or weapons of our enemy speak to our spirit with any truth or efficacy.

The internet is the fakest and gayest shit on the planet, you’re detaching action from words, you’re devaluing experience from first to second hand to third hand and so on. Everything about our arrangement here is insincere by its very nature. In reality, you are nothing more than pixels on a screen, of which we can only infer each others existence rather then experience it first hand.

This medium is solipsism incarnate. It might serve as a temporary medium while we find ways to engage with people in person, but if all you’re doing is spending time online instead of finding real ways to connect with people then you’ve quite frankly lost sight of the entire point of this movement.
We are fighting for a people, not for the mere ideas of said people expressed on a screen, but for their continued proliferation and their physical/material existence. What point is there in fighting for those people if you never honestly meet them in person?

IQ is also a predictor for pretty much every other human capacity, such as EQ, and just about everything else. As such, intelligent is absolutely not defined by Quantity, but by Quality.
You can have 1000 books in your library and 110 IQ, you are still going to be less intelligent than somebody with 100 books in their library and 130 IQ.

Action emerges when you take action. A strategy that is so abstract that it hinders any kind of movement is retarded and defective. And if your strategy does not involve action from the very start of it, be it in the management of your health and fitness, the acquisition of resources, courting a wife, buying land, or organizing with people in person and not online, then that strategy is worthless.